i do not think thumbnails would help. i like the way you choose the best shot and offer +'s inviting me to see more in the series. it's good the way it is.
hi was just sort of browsing friends of a community that you are in and i really like your work. i post a lot of pictures so maybe you'll like them. i added you, wanna add me? oh and fuck thumbnails.
Nah, I already have two thumbnails, and don't need any more.
I very much like your large pictures, having to click on a thumbnail to see them would NOT make me happier. This world is already getting too small! I mean, really, one of my friends actually suggested that I watch Lawrence of Arabia on her Laptop!
That's a question, not a poll! Poll's have clicky-things! (Oh, maybe polls are only for paid users...)
I wouldn't move towards thumbnails, but I would group your photos better, with all but one in a group behind the cut. ie, a post with two dog photos promptly followed by another post with three dog photos would be better as one post of five dog photos.
Not that it'd make much difference in my case as I always look behind the cut at your photos...
If you were writing lots, I don't think I could say that, as sometimes I just haven't the time to read every post. Pictures are good in that respect, as a quick look tells you whether you want to look longer.
I think it's cool. People who friend you know they're going to get big pics on their friends page. I was actually missing them when your camera was broken. :D
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-02 09:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-02 10:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 05:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 05:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-02 10:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 05:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-02 10:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 05:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-02 11:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 05:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 12:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 05:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 12:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 05:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 01:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 05:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 01:10 am (UTC)oh and fuck thumbnails.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 05:30 am (UTC)size DOES matter.
Date: 2005-10-03 01:17 am (UTC)I very much like your large pictures, having to click on a thumbnail to see them would NOT make me happier. This world is already getting too small! I mean, really, one of my friends actually suggested that I watch Lawrence of Arabia on her Laptop!
So please dear lady, stay large!
Re: size DOES matter.
Date: 2005-10-03 05:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 02:20 am (UTC)I wouldn't move towards thumbnails, but I would group your photos better, with all but one in a group behind the cut. ie, a post with two dog photos promptly followed by another post with three dog photos would be better as one post of five dog photos.
Not that it'd make much difference in my case as I always look behind the cut at your photos...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 05:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 07:53 am (UTC)it's good the way it is
Date: 2005-10-03 02:21 am (UTC)Re: it's good the way it is
Date: 2005-10-03 05:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 11:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 11:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 11:36 am (UTC)of course fuck all thumbnails))
ааааа... не хочу на английском говорить! и почему у тебя тут все амерекосы?
где русский патриотизм?! хотят понимать тебя - пусть русский учвт:)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 11:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 02:19 pm (UTC)но у меня оправдание - "безвыходное положение"
и мой английский - лишь для того что бы читать Гарри Поттера в оригинале:)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 06:24 pm (UTC)d.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 06:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 06:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 06:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 08:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-03 10:11 pm (UTC)