vriad_lee: (Default)
[personal profile] vriad_lee
you can't really say 'for those who IS...', now can you?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-10 09:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emptymotel.livejournal.com
no
those is plural

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-10 09:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
that's good. still, google returns some 128000 hits

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-10 09:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] starshoj.livejournal.com
Ученье - свет, а неучёных - тьма.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-10 11:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
yeah, right. those is plural and this are singular

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 01:47 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 02:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] indigobl.livejournal.com
I think you have it right.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-10 09:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kazablanka.livejournal.com
you can if you's a nigga. :P

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-10 11:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
i mean i is

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 04:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kazablanka.livejournal.com
you my favorite nigga :)))

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 12:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
that's a nice compliment considering you should have a very wide choice ))

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 04:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kazablanka.livejournal.com
i could have sworn it was! (left your sense of humor at home today?) :))

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 09:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
right, no racial slurs here... you albino!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 09:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
i mean you, snow flake!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 02:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] indigobl.livejournal.com
If it was that sort of speak, I would expect:

for those who BE

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 05:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kazablanka.livejournal.com
both variations are Ebonically-valid. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-10 09:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darksomnabule.livejournal.com
"for those who are" :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-10 11:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sylys.livejournal.com
All sites: 25 000 (http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&as_qdr=all&q=%22for+those+who+is%22&btnG=Rechercher&meta=) out of 79 900 000 (http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&as_qdr=all&q=%22for+those+who%22&btnG=Rechercher&meta=) = 0.032%

UK sites: 342 (http://www.google.fr/search?as_q=%22for+those+who+is%22&num=10&hl=fr&btnG=Recherche+Google&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=.uk&safe=images) out of 3 410 000 (http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&as_qdr=all&q=%22for+those+who%22+site%3A.uk&meta=) = 0.01%

Trust the Brits.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-10 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
oh no... not the brits!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 02:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] indigobl.livejournal.com
"Trust the Brits."

This reminds me of a few lines:

Trust me, you cannot get pregnant the first time.

Trust me, I won't get you pregnant.

Trust me, all your friends are doing it.

Trust me, you have nothing to worry about.



Trust me, Trust me, Trust me...

.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 09:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
don't trust him, he'll get you preggers right away

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 04:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] indigobl.livejournal.com
Oh no, I won't get her preggers. I cannot have children. It's impossible. Trust me.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 05:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] indigobl.livejournal.com
Haven't you ever heard of immaculate conception? No lie! It wasn't me.

Don't you believe in miracles?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 06:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
who needs immaculate conception as long as there's the regular way!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 10:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sylys.livejournal.com
Ah, catholic priests are evil really.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 04:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] indigobl.livejournal.com
Oh I wish I were a catholic priest, as little boys don't ever end up pregnant, then I would never ever have to concern myself with a pregnancy.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 04:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
you just said you can't have children you lier

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 05:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] indigobl.livejournal.com
No lie! Little boys cannot give birth, and we all know that's the only desire of the catholic priests.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 03:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poemtree.livejournal.com
you can say anything you want to say!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 09:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
ahh... lindsay, only you know how to give me an orgasm

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 10:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stillcarl.livejournal.com
Looking at the first ten Google hits for your quote, the IS should be ARE in most cases.

Still, there is a singular/plural problem in English when you wish to refer to a him or a her without specifying their gender.

"And then he started reading."

"And then she started reading."

Now try and switch the 'he' or 'her' to a gender-free word!

I tend to use 'they' even though it'll sound plural out of context, as do others, the idea being to turn it into a word that's allowed to be singular depending on context. Compare...

"And then they started reading."

Sounds like there's more than one reading. Let's add more to it though...

"A stranger entered the empty room. And then they started reading."

and then it almost works! :-) And would if you knew for sure there was no one else about...

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-11 10:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
yes, that's the form i use to make pc sentences where 'he/his/him' would be used in olden times. i actually like it much better than 's/he' and other such abominations. some people just switched to 'she'. i remember reading a microsoft article where they referred to a potential 'malicious user' as 'she'

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags