vriad_lee: (Default)
[personal profile] vriad_lee
it's not a call for compliments or pep talk or some-thing. it's merely a technical question. many individual posts may crowd one's friends page, right? would it make you feel comfortable-er if i used lj-cut more. or would that be less comfortable. or maybe you don't give a fuck et cetera. because i mean that the number of photos would be the same, but the number of individual posts may be reduced. LOOK ME IN THE EYE

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-12 01:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thirdjane.livejournal.com
With how many pictures you post, I wouldn't click all the lj-cuts. I'm lazy. Very lazy. Leaving them un-cut means less work for me, and that makes me happy.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-12 01:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
ok, then i guess even if i wanted to cut i'd have to go on uncircumcised.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-13 04:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sheila-peitra.livejournal.com
yes, uncut works for me in more ways than one......

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-13 04:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
yes? please elaborate! i though cut was like more popular in america.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-13 12:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sheila-peitra.livejournal.com
Perhaps. When it comes to the human body, I like it the way it was created.... in all places. I also object to cutting off piece of a human's body before he has given consent for such mutilation modification. I also think it's more attractive uncut. But that's just me ;-)

Similarly, your pictures are more attractive uncut, so it works for me in more ways than one.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-13 01:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vriad-lee.livejournal.com
to tell you the truth i have never seen a cut person. i mean the cut of a cut person. it's an exotic thing in russia, perhaps not so much nowadays as before but anyways.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags