Haha, sly fox uh ? Well, maybe would you feel better if i told you i'm deadly jealous of your camera :)
*been thinking to buy one for a while, but those are expensive toys, and i'm afraid i'd be too lazy to bother carrying it everywhere like i do with my compact since it's significantly bigger.*
Well not all compact cameras are bad, even though i'll give it to you most are crappy, but the Canon Ixus serie is known to be a good one, for both optical and usage reasons.
As i mentionned in my journal, i'm not totally satisfied of this specific picture, because i actually significantly lost in quality compared to my master picture. I thought a slight rotation would make the composition better, which it does, but the loss of quality is very saddening. Everything comes with a price as some friend of mine just noticed :) But i don't think i shall ever rotate a picture again.
As for post-production, i'm usually not too heavy-handed for i don't want my pictures look like some expressionist painting. Nevertheless there are basic adjustement operations which can greatly improve a picture's look without altering the natural feeling.
First, if needed, the composition can be corrected and balanced by cropping judiciously the right portion (the rule of the 3-thirds can be of some use). Then contrast and brightness should be adjusted, for raw pictures out-of-the-box rarely give justice to the reality. For this purpose, the Auto contrast, Auto levels and Auto colors in photoshop can do wonders. Curves can afterward eventually be adjusted, that is a magical tool as well - it can make a masterpiece of a picture, or totally kill it, choices to make, that's where post-production becomes an artistic part of the creation as well. The selective color tool requires a bit of practice as well, but can be very useful to correct color tones. Add a bit of cloning to that in order to remove disturbing artefacts, and a final, wisely dosed, unsharp mask filter on the reduced picture to reveal fine details, and you should be able to do miracles :)
i'm awfully wary of photoshop adjustments, although i know it's stupid as camera adjusts images automatically anyways. i sometimes use brightness/contrast balance (not automatic) to make tine changes in very dark pictures. i use .jpg, not raw, because i'm lazy and also because i don't want to 'make up' the picture myself, i want it to be as close to reality as possible, and by postprocessing time i could forget how everything looked at the time of shooting. i don't see how rotation can affect picture quality
I understand, and share, your wariness very much. The point to keep in mind is: To reveal the picture. Not to make it lie.
(Rotation is one of the most quality damaging operation you could imagine - except +/- 90° obviously. All the pixels of the picture are impacted and interpolated. You can try to rotate a picture 1° in a direction, then 1° backward, and compare with your original picture, all the fine details are killed =( )
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-11 12:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-11 06:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-12 07:10 pm (UTC)Well, maybe would you feel better
if i told you i'm deadly jealous of your camera :)
*been thinking to buy one for a while,
but those are expensive toys, and i'm afraid
i'd be too lazy to bother carrying it everywhere
like i do with my compact since it's significantly bigger.*
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-12 07:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-12 08:12 pm (UTC)even though i'll give it to you most are crappy,
but the Canon Ixus serie is known to be a good one,
for both optical and usage reasons.
As i mentionned in my journal, i'm not totally
satisfied of this specific picture, because i
actually significantly lost in quality compared
to my master picture. I thought a slight rotation
would make the composition better, which it does,
but the loss of quality is very saddening. Everything
comes with a price as some friend of mine just noticed :)
But i don't think i shall ever rotate a picture again.
As for post-production, i'm usually not too heavy-handed
for i don't want my pictures look like some expressionist
painting. Nevertheless there are basic adjustement operations
which can greatly improve a picture's look without altering the
natural feeling.
First, if needed, the composition can be corrected and balanced by
cropping judiciously the right portion (the rule of the 3-thirds can
be of some use). Then contrast and brightness should be adjusted, for
raw pictures out-of-the-box rarely give justice to the reality. For
this purpose, the Auto contrast, Auto levels and Auto colors in photoshop
can do wonders. Curves can afterward eventually be adjusted, that is
a magical tool as well - it can make a masterpiece of a picture, or
totally kill it, choices to make, that's where post-production becomes
an artistic part of the creation as well. The selective color tool
requires a bit of practice as well, but can be very useful to correct
color tones. Add a bit of cloning to that in order to remove disturbing
artefacts, and a final, wisely dosed, unsharp mask filter on the reduced
picture to reveal fine details, and you should be able to do miracles :)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-12 08:35 pm (UTC)i don't see how rotation can affect picture quality
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-12 09:35 pm (UTC)The point to keep in mind is: To reveal the picture.
Not to make it lie.
(Rotation is one of the most quality damaging operation you
could imagine - except +/- 90° obviously. All the pixels
of the picture are impacted and interpolated. You can
try to rotate a picture 1° in a direction, then 1°
backward, and compare with your original picture,
all the fine details are killed =( )
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-12 10:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-11 07:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-11 07:23 am (UTC)