it's funny how in russian the fox is female, and the stork is male, as well as the corresponding nouns -- lissa (fox) - feminine gender, aist (stork) -- masculine gender.
That is quite amusing indeed, if not scarry, how such liguistic considerations can model our perception.
Man, the fox is awfully boyish and the stork is definitely feminine, you silly russianZ kozatchok (http://www.podillya.narod.ru/repertof.html) dancerZ ! Are you out of your mind !
(Though i admit one looking at a stork in a freudian manner can obviously see a big penis there)
cultural differences aside, you must have some loose screws in your head, if you find this feminine sister foxy boyish:
we have 'lis' (masculine gender) in some translated contes, but not in contes populaires. btw, in russian version of the tale there is a crane (zhuravl', also masculine gender), not a stork
speaking about kozatchok, can you lilly ass leather coach loafers do this:
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 07:57 am (UTC)sly bitch!
it's funny how in russian the fox is female, and the stork is male, as well as the corresponding nouns -- lissa (fox) - feminine gender, aist (stork) -- masculine gender.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-15 01:11 am (UTC)how such liguistic considerations
can model our perception.
Man, the fox is awfully boyish
and the stork is definitely feminine,
you silly russianZ kozatchok (http://www.podillya.narod.ru/repertof.html) dancerZ !
Are you out of your mind !
(Though i admit one looking at a stork in a freudian
manner can obviously see a big penis there)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-15 07:25 am (UTC)we have 'lis' (masculine gender) in some translated contes, but not in contes populaires.
btw, in russian version of the tale there is a crane (zhuravl', also masculine gender), not a stork
speaking about kozatchok, can you lilly ass leather coach loafers do this:
eh-he-he, and i can
*under the shock*
Date: 2005-03-15 07:41 am (UTC)a transexual fox,
that is just bad !
Re: *under the shock*
Date: 2005-03-15 07:47 am (UTC)Re: *under the shock*
Date: 2005-03-15 07:56 am (UTC)